NEW BRAINDUMPS ISO-IEC-27005-RISK-MANAGER BOOK, REAL ISO-IEC-27005-RISK-MANAGER EXAM DUMPS

New Braindumps ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Book, Real ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Dumps

New Braindumps ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Book, Real ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Dumps

Blog Article

Tags: New Braindumps ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Book, Real ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Dumps, ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Exam Testking, Latest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Camp, Exam ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Review

The PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager certification examination is an essential component of professional development, and passing this PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager test can increase career options and a rise in salary. Nonetheless, getting ready for the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager (ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager) exam may be difficult, and many working professionals have trouble locating the PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice questions they need to succeed in this endeavor.

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Other Information Security Risk Assessment Methods: Beyond ISO
  • IEC 27005, this domain reviews alternative methods for assessing and managing risks, allowing organizations to select tools and frameworks that align best with their specific requirements and risk profile.
Topic 2
  • Implementation of an Information Security Risk Management Program: This domain discusses the steps for setting up and operationalizing a risk management program, including procedures to recognize, evaluate, and reduce security risks within an organization’s framework.
Topic 3
  • Information Security Risk Management Framework and Processes Based on ISO
  • IEC 27005: Centered around ISO
  • IEC 27005, this domain provides structured guidelines for managing information security risks, promoting a systematic and standardized approach aligned with international practices.
Topic 4
  • Fundamental Principles and Concepts of Information Security Risk Management: This domain covers the essential ideas and core elements behind managing risks in information security, with a focus on identifying and mitigating potential threats to protect valuable data and IT resources.

>> New Braindumps ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Book <<

Real ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Dumps, ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Exam Testking

As far as the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice test are concerned, these ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice questions are designed and verified by the experience and qualified PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam trainers. They work together and strive hard to maintain the top standard of ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam practice questions all the time. So you rest assured that with the PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Dumps you will ace your PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam preparation and feel confident to solve all questions in the final PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Sample Questions (Q27-Q32):

NEW QUESTION # 27
Scenario 2: Travivve is a travel agency that operates in more than 100 countries. Headquartered in San Francisco, the US, the agency is known for its personalized vacation packages and travel services. Travivve aims to deliver reliable services that meet its clients' needs. Considering the impact of information security in its reputation, Travivve decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. In addition, they decided to establish and implement an information security risk management program. Based on the priority of specific departments in Travivve, the top management decided to initially apply the risk management process only in the Sales Management Department. The process would be applicable for other departments only when introducing new technology.
Travivve's top management wanted to make sure that the risk management program is established based on the industry best practices. Therefore, they created a team of three members that would be responsible for establishing and implementing it. One of the team members was Travivve's risk manager who was responsible for supervising the team and planning all risk management activities. In addition, the risk manager was responsible for monitoring the program and reporting the monitoring results to the top management.
Initially, the team decided to analyze the internal and external context of Travivve. As part of the process of understanding the organization and its context, the team identified key processes and activities. Then, the team identified the interested parties and their basic requirements and determined the status of compliance with these requirements. In addition, the team identified all the reference documents that applied to the defined scope of the risk management process, which mainly included the Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and the internal security rules established by Travivve. Lastly, the team analyzed both reference documents and justified a few noncompliances with those requirements.
The risk manager selected the information security risk management method which was aligned with other approaches used by the company to manage other risks. The team also communicated the risk management process to all interested parties through previously established communication mechanisms. In addition, they made sure to inform all interested parties about their roles and responsibilities regarding risk management. Travivve also decided to involve interested parties in its risk management activities since, according to the top management, this process required their active participation.
Lastly, Travivve's risk management team decided to conduct the initial information security risk assessment process. As such, the team established the criteria for performing the information security risk assessment which included the consequence criteria and likelihood criteria.
Based on scenario 2, the team decided to involve interested parties in risk management activities. Is this a good practice?

  • A. No. only internal interested parties should be involved in risk management activities
  • B. Yes, relevant interested parties should be involved in risk management activities to ensure the successful completion of the risk assessment
  • C. No, only the risk management team should be involved in risk management activities

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, involving relevant interested parties in the risk management process is considered a best practice. This approach ensures that all perspectives are considered, and relevant knowledge is leveraged, which helps in comprehensively identifying, analyzing, and managing risks. Interested parties, such as stakeholders, can provide valuable insights and information regarding the organization's assets, processes, threats, and vulnerabilities, contributing to a more accurate and effective risk assessment. Therefore, option B is correct because it supports the principle that involving relevant parties leads to a more successful risk assessment process. Options A and C are incorrect because excluding either external interested parties or restricting involvement only to the risk management team would limit the effectiveness of the risk management process.


NEW QUESTION # 28
Scenario 5: Detika is a private cardiology clinic in Pennsylvania, the US. Detika has one of the most advanced healthcare systems for treating heart diseases. The clinic uses sophisticated apparatus that detects heart diseases in early stages. Since 2010, medical information of Detika's patients is stored on the organization's digital systems. Electronic health records (EHR), among others, include patients' diagnosis, treatment plan, and laboratory results.
Storing and accessing patient and other medical data digitally was a huge and a risky step for Detik a. Considering the sensitivity of information stored in their systems, Detika conducts regular risk assessments to ensure that all information security risks are identified and managed. Last month, Detika conducted a risk assessment which was focused on the EHR system. During risk identification, the IT team found out that some employees were not updating the operating systems regularly. This could cause major problems such as a data breach or loss of software compatibility. In addition, the IT team tested the software and detected a flaw in one of the software modules used. Both issues were reported to the top management and they decided to implement appropriate controls for treating the identified risks. They decided to organize training sessions for all employees in order to make them aware of the importance of the system updates. In addition, the manager of the IT Department was appointed as the person responsible for ensuring that the software is regularly tested.
Another risk identified during the risk assessment was the risk of a potential ransomware attack. This risk was defined as low because all their data was backed up daily. The IT team decided to accept the actual risk of ransomware attacks and concluded that additional measures were not required. This decision was documented in the risk treatment plan and communicated to the risk owner. The risk owner approved the risk treatment plan and documented the risk assessment results.
Following that, Detika initiated the implementation of new controls. In addition, one of the employees of the IT Department was assigned the responsibility for monitoring the implementation process and ensure the effectiveness of the security controls. The IT team, on the other hand, was responsible for allocating the resources needed to effectively implement the new controls.
Based on scenario 5, the decision to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack was approved by the risk owner. Is this acceptable?

  • A. No, all interested parties should approve the risk treatment plan
  • B. Yes, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the risk owners
  • C. No, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the top management and implemented by risk owners

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the risk owners, who are the individuals or entities responsible for managing specific risks. In the scenario, the risk owner approved the decision to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack and documented it in the risk treatment plan. This is consistent with the guidelines, which state that risk owners are responsible for deciding on risk treatment and approving the associated plans. Thus, option C is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which emphasizes that risk treatment plans should be approved by the risk owners.


NEW QUESTION # 29
Scenario 1
The risk assessment process was led by Henry, Bontton's risk manager. The first step that Henry took was identifying the company's assets. Afterward, Henry created various potential incident scenarios. One of the main concerns regarding the use of the application was the possibility of being targeted by cyber attackers, as a great number of organizations were experiencing cyberattacks during that time. After analyzing the identified risks, Henry evaluated them and concluded that new controls must be implemented if the company wants to use the application. Among others, he stated that training should be provided to personnel regarding the use of the application and that awareness sessions should be conducted regarding the importance of protecting customers' personal data.
Lastly, Henry communicated the risk assessment results to the top management. They decided that the application will be used only after treating the identified risks.
Based on scenario 1, Bontton used ISO/IEC 27005 to ensure effective implementation of all ISO/IEC 27001 requirements. Is this appropriate?

  • A. Yes, ISO/IEC 27005 provides direct guidance on the implementation of the requirements given in ISO/IEC 27001
  • B. Yes, ISO/IEC 27005 provides a number of methodologies that can be used under the risk management framework for implementing all requirements given in ISO/IEC 27001
  • C. No, ISO/IEC 27005 does not contain direct guidance on the implementation of all requirements given in ISO/IEC 27001

Answer: C

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 is an international standard specifically focused on providing guidelines for information security risk management within the context of an organization's overall Information Security Management System (ISMS). It does not provide direct guidance on implementing the specific requirements of ISO/IEC 27001, which is a standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an ISMS. Instead, ISO/IEC 27005 provides a framework for managing risks that could affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. Therefore, while ISO/IEC 27005 supports the risk management process that is crucial for compliance with ISO/IEC 27001, it does not contain specific guidelines or methodologies for implementing all the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. This makes option C the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, "Information Security Risk Management," which emphasizes risk management guidance rather than direct implementation of ISO/IEC 27001 requirements.
ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 6.1.2, "Information Security Risk Assessment," where risk assessment and treatment options are outlined but not in a prescriptive manner found in ISO/IEC 27005.


NEW QUESTION # 30
According to ISO/IEC 27000, what is the definition of information security?

  • A. Preservation of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information
  • B. Preservation of authenticity, accountability, and reliability in the cyberspace
  • C. Protection of privacy during the processing of personally identifiable information

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27000, information security is defined as the "preservation of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information." This definition highlights the three core principles of information security:
Confidentiality ensures that information is not disclosed to unauthorized individuals or systems.
Integrity ensures the accuracy and completeness of information and its processing methods.
Availability ensures that authorized users have access to information and associated assets when required.
This definition encompasses the protection of information in all forms and aligns with ISO/IEC 27005's guidelines on managing information security risks. Therefore, option A is the correct answer. Options B and C are incorrect as they refer to more specific aspects or other areas of information management.


NEW QUESTION # 31
According to ISO 31000, which of the following is a principle of risk management?

  • A. Dynamic
  • B. Reliability
  • C. Qualitative

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to ISO 31000, a principle of risk management is that it should be dynamic. This means that risk management practices should be flexible and able to adapt to changes in the internal and external environment of the organization. Risks are constantly evolving due to changes in technology, regulatory requirements, market conditions, and other factors, and risk management must be capable of responding to these changes. Option A is correct because it aligns with this principle. Option B (Qualitative) refers to a method for assessing risk rather than a principle of risk management, and Option C (Reliability) is not listed as a principle in ISO 31000.


NEW QUESTION # 32
......

It is well known that even the best people fail sometimes, not to mention the ordinary people. In face of the PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam, everyone stands on the same starting line, and those who are not excellent enough must do more. If you happen to be one of them, our PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Learning Materials will greatly reduce your burden and improve your possibility of passing the exam. Our advantages of time-saving and efficient can make you no longer be afraid of the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam.

Real ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Dumps: https://www.vceengine.com/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager-vce-test-engine.html

Report this page